If you take away all of Christianity and mysticism from Christian mysticism you’ll have Rupert’s teaching. If you take Advaita and Vedanta out of Advaita Vedanta you’ll have what Rupert is teaching. If you take Tibet and Buddhism out of Tibetan Buddhism you’ll have what Rupert is trying to teach. Rupert does a stunning job with language deviation showing how yes you can use one expression temporarily and qualify it in order to make a certain point and then clarify later what it was and where you were going with it so that you can make your real point while Jim and Tony are kind a locked into very temporary language.

While all of this is high praise for Rupert that doesn’t by itself prove that Rupert’s teaching is better than Tony’s and Jim’s.