Category Archives: Ramana Maharshi

How did ignorance arise? GOAL okay? -RM

Q: How did ignorance (avidya] arise at all?

Sri Ramana Maharshi :
Ignorance never arose.
It has no real being.
That which is, is only vidya [knowledge].

Q: Why then do I not realize it?

Sri Ramana Maharshi :
Because of the samskaras.
However, find out who does not realize and what he does not realize. Then it will be clear that there is no avidya.

●●Q: So, it is wrong to begin with a goal, is it?

Sri Ramana Maharshi :
If there is a goal to be reached it cannot be permanent.
The goal must already be there.
We seek to reach the goal with the ego,
but the goal exists before the ego.

What is in the goal is even prior to our birth, that is, to the birth of the ego. Because we exist the ego appears to exist too.

If we look on the Self as the ego then we become the ego,
if as the mind we become the mind,
if as the body we become the body.

It is the thought which builds up sheaths in so many ways.
The shadow on the water is found to be shaking.

Can anyone stop the shaking of the shadow?
If it would cease to shake you would not notice the water but only the light.
Similarly take no notice of the ego and its activities,
but see only the light behind.

The ego is the thought I'. The trueI’ is the Self.

Q: If it is just a question of giving up ideas then it is only one step to realization.

Sri Ramana Maharshi :

Realization is already there.
The state free from thoughts is the only real state.
There is no such action as realization.

Is there anyone who is not realizing the Self ?
Does anyone deny his own existence?

Speaking of realization, it implies two selves

  • the one to realize, the other to be realized.

What is not already realized is sought to be realized.
Once we admit our existence,
how is it that we do not know our Self ?

Q: Because of the thoughts,the mind.

Sri Ramana Maharshi :

Quite so.
It is the mind that veils our happiness.
How do we know that we exist ?
If you say because of the world around us,
then how do you know that you existed in deep sleep?

~ From Be as you are book

Application -RM

●●●CLICK HERE \|/ ●●●

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-REFm87krQo

  1. Will the discrimination between the real and the unreal be enough to liberate or is there any other spiritual practice for it?
  2. For seekers of truth is the critical study of the scriptures alone enough for liberation or is spiritual practice in accordance with guru’s guidance also necessary?
  3. How does a person of steady knowledge know that he is one such?
  4. Is it because of the awareness of the fullness of his knowledge or is it because of cessation of objective awareness?
  5. By what hallmark do the learned recognize the knower?
  6. Does Samadhi, the conscious absorption of the mind in the heart result only in knowledge or does it also fulfill desires?
  7. If one practicing yoga, spiritual practices, for fulfilling desires becomes a steadfast knower of the self, will that desire be fulfilled anyway or not?

ANSWERS FROM RAMANA

Self abidance alone is enough to free anyone from bondage. However the discrimination between the real and the unreal leads to distaste for the transient. The profound jnani is always rooted in the self alone.

2.5 min more

No human guru -RM

Devotee. But there are some who seem to have had no human Guru at all.

Bhagwan Sri Ramana Maharshi: True. In the case of certain great souls God reveals himself as the Light of their light from within.

Devotee: Then what is true devotion (Bhakti) ?

Bhagwan Sri Ramana: Whatever I do or consider myself doing is really the Lord’s doing. Nothing really belongs to me. I am here for the service of the Lord. This spirit of service really is devotion supreme and the true devotee sees the Supreme Being as the Lord immanent in everything. Worship of Him by name and form leads one beyond all name and form. Devotion Complete culminates in Knowledge Supreme.

Even when Bhakti, devotion, is actuated by worldly desires in the beginning, it does not cease when the desires are fulfilled. It increases by an unshakable faith growing perfectly into a supreme state of realization.

Devotee. Then what is the path of Jnana (Knowledge) ?

Bhagwan Sri Ramana: Stripped of the ego he establishes himself naturally in supreme Self-awareness.

Devotee: How can we say that both Bhakti(Devotion) and Jnana (Knowledge) lead to the same goal ?

Bhagwan Sri Ramana: Why not? Both paths lead you to a state of supreme Peace, Mounam, that passeth all understanding.

Sat Darshanam Bhashya and Talks with Maharshi

Thanks Anil Kumar Sinha

🌸🌼🌾🌼🌸🌼🌾🌼🌸🌼🌾🌼🌸🙏

MAYA ISN’T FALSEHOOD PER SE BUT SEEMS SO UNTIL JIVA REMEMBERS ITS REAL IDENTITY

Maya is not falsehood, although it has the appearance of it, but the active side of Reality. It is the maker of forms in Consciousness and form means variety, which causes illusion – mind you, all this variety is in consciousness and nowhere else; it is only in the mind. One jiva, seeing another jiva, forgets its identity with it and thinks of it as separate from itself. But the moment it turns its attention on its own nature as consciousness, and not as form, the illusion of diversity or separateness breaks as a dream breaks when waking takes place.

(Bhagavan in ‘Guru Ramana’ IX.1)

VERY MUCH LIKE GOLDSMITH AND FITCH TEACHING THAT WE CAN HEAL BY REALIZING THE I OR CHRIST OF ME IS EXACTLY THE DAME AS THE I OR CHRIST (GOD) OF PATIENT (SO THERE IS NO PATIENT).

Definitions -RM

🌸 🌟 🌸 🌸 🌟 🌸 🌸 🌟 🌸 🌸 🌟 🌸

  • * * Kundalini Sakti – Chinmaya Deha * * *

Yesterday morning an Andhra youth came here with his wife.
It seems he has come here after visiting the whole of the Himalayan region.

In the afternoon at 3 o’clock he
approached Bhagavan and said,
“Swami, is the manifestation of Kundalini Sakti
(a form of yogic power) possible only for those
who follow the yogic path of acquiring sakti (power) or
is it possible also for those
who follow the path of devotion (bhakti) or love (prem)?”

Bhagavan Sri Ramana :
“Who does not have Kundalini Sakti?
When the real nature of that Sakti is known,
it is called Akhandakara Vritti (Plenary consciousness) or
Aham Sphurana (effulgence of ‘I’, ‘I’).
Kundalini Sakti is there for all people
whatever path they follow.
It is only a difference in name.”

Questioner: “It is said that that sakti manifests itself in
five phases, ten phases, hundred phases and a thousand
phases. Which is true – five or ten or a hundred or a
thousand?”

Bhagavan Sri Ramana :
“Sakti has only one phase.
If it is said to manifest itself in several phases,
it is only a way of speaking.
The Sakti is only one.”

Questioner: “To realise the Self, some say you must
concentrate your mind on the anahatam (the 4th of the mystical
chakras [plexuses] of the body); some say on the sahasraram (a
mystical plexus in the brain with a thousand petals); and some
say on the muladharam (a mystical plexus about the organs of
generation). Which is the most important?”

Bhagavan Sri Ramana :
“All are important.
Self (Atman) is everywhere in the body.
Some say you should see it in the muladharam;
some say in the anahatam and
some say in the sahasraram.
It is the same whichever it is.
But, for all of them, the place of birth
and of dissolution is anahatam only.”

Questioner: “Can a Jnani help not only those who follow
his path but also others who follow other paths?”

Bhagavan Sri Ramana :
“Undoubtedly.
He can help people whatever
path they choose to follow.
It is something like this.
Suppose there is a hill.
There will be very many paths to climb it.
If he were to ask people to climb by the way he came,
some may like it and some may not.
If people who do not like it are asked to climb by that path,
and by that path only,
they will not be able to come up.
Hence a Jnani helps people following
any particular path whatever it may be.
People who are midway may not know
about the merits and demerits of other paths,
but one who has climbed the summit and sits
there observing others coming up is able to see all the paths.
He will therefore be able to tell people
who are coming up to move a little to this side or
that or to avoid a pitfall.
The goal is the same for all, you see.”

The young man was not satisfied with the replies given
by Bhagavan and again began asking questions about Kundalini Sakti and how it arises.
Bhagavan appeared unconcerned about those questions
but when they were asked repeatedly, said,

“What do I know about those paths?
Please ask those who know them well.”

Giving up the topic,the young man took up the topic of spiritual bodies (chinmaya dehas) by saying,
“My Guru gave a darshan in chinmaya rupam
(form) on such and such a day, spoke to me of this and that,”
and started speaking about the miracles performed by his
deceased Guru.

Bhagavan did not speak but kept quiet for some time.
At last the young man said,
“Is it a fact that Lord Krishna is still with his chinmaya deha (spiritual body)?”

Bhagavan Sri Ramana replied with patience:
“Does chinmaya deha mean the human body?
Chinmaya means Chit-prakasa, i.e. luster of the spirit.
That light is always existent:

“ Arjuna, I am the Self seated in the heart of all beings.
I am the beginning and middle and
also the end of all beings.
Gita, X: 20

“Does that mean that
He is in the hearts of all beings with this material body?
It means He is in the hearts of all beings in the shape Aham Sphurana (effulgence of ‘I’, ‘I’).
That effulgence of the Self is known as Chit-prakasa or Chinmaya.”

Questioner: “Is the same thing said of other Mahapurushas
(great personages) or is it that Lord Krishna’s body becomes
Chinmayam and remains like that?”

Bhagavan Sri Ramana :
“Oh ! You think that that body becomes
Chinmayam and sits somewhere.
The whole world is Chinmayam.
That being so is it that one body alone has become Chinmayam?
Visions (sakshatkaras) are also like this.
People say that they descend from somewhere with a body.
That which is omnipresent you leave or ignore and
talk of karam and sakshatkaram.”

~ Letters from Sri Ramanasramam, 18th January, 1949

Thanks Sri Ramana Maharshi Teachings. श्री रमण महर्षि के उपदेश

🌸 🌟 🌸 🌸 🌟 🌸 🌸 🌟 🌸 🌸 🌟 🌸 🙏

The I-thought -RM, RSpira

“WHO AM I ?”: THE FULL PROCESS OF ‘SELF-ENQUIRY’

“For all thoughts, the source is the ‘I-Thought’.

The mind will merge only by the Self-enquiry; ‘Who Am I?’

The thought; ‘Who am l?’, will destroy all other thoughts, and finally kill itself, also.

If other thoughts arise – without trying to complete them, one must enquire: ‘to whom did this thought arise?’

What does it matter how many thoughts arise? As each thought arises, one must be watchful and ask: ‘To whom is this thought occurring’?

The answer will be: ‘to me’.

If you then enquire: ‘Who am I ?’, the mind will return to its Source (or where it issued from). The thought which arose, will also submerge.

As you practise like this – more and more, the power of the mind to remain at its source, is increased.

By means of a moderate quantity of satvic (pure) food, which is superior to all other rules and regulations of self discipline, the satvic – or pure quality of the mind, will grow, and Self-Enquiry – will be helped.

Though ancient and timeless sense, attachments – in the shape of Vasanas (subtle tendencies) may rise; countless like the waves of the sea, they will all be destroyed, as ‘dhyana’ progresses.

Without giving any room. for doubt; ‘whether it would at all be possible to eradicate all those vasanas, and BE The Self – Alone, one must take hold – ceaselessly, of dhyana of The Self.

However great a sinner one may be, instead of lamenting: ‘I am a great sinner, how can I make any progress?’ – one must completely forget the fact of being a sinner, and earnestly pursue meditation of Self. He is then sure to succeed!

If the ego is present, all else will also exist. If it is absent, all else will also vanish.

As ego is all ‘this’; to enquire what this ego is. is to give up all attachment.

Controlling speech and breath, and diving deep within oneself; as a man dives into water to recover something that has fallen there, one must find out The Source from whence the ego rises, by means of ‘keen insight’.

‘Enquiry’ – which constitutes the path of Jnana, consists not in orally repeating ‘I’ – ‘I’, but in searching – by means of a deeply introverted mind – wherefrom the ‘i’ springs.

To think: ‘i’ am not this’, or ‘ii am that’, may be of help in the enquiry, but cannot be ‘the actual Enquiry’.

When we quest within our mind, ‘Who am i ?’, and reach The Heart, the ‘i’ topples down – and immediately, another entity will reveal itself, proclaiming ‘I-I’.

Even though IT also merges saying, ‘I’, IT does not connote the ego, but ‘The One Perfect Existence’.

If we unceasingly investigate the form of the mind, we find there is no such thing as the mind.

This is The Direct Path – open to all.

Thoughts alone constitute the mind; and for all thoughts, ‘the base’ – or Source, is the ‘I-thought’: This ‘i’, is the mind.

If we go inward – questing for The Source of the ‘i’, the ‘i’ topples down. This is ‘The Jnana Enquiry’.

Where the ‘i’ merges, another entity emerges, as ‘I-I’.., of its own accord.
… That is The Perfect Self!

There is no use removing doubts. If we clear one doubt another arises, and there will be no end of doubts.

All doubts will cease only when ‘the doubter’, and his source, have been found. Seek for the source of the doubter, and you find he is really nonexistent;

Doubter ceasing, doubts will cease.

Reality – being yourSelf, there is nothing for you to Realize. All are regarding ‘the unreal’ – as Real. What is required is that you give up regarding ‘the unreal’, as Real.

The object of all meditation (Dhyana), or Japa, is only that: to give up all thoughts – regarding the non-self; to give up many thoughts, and to hold on to one thought.

The object of all sadhana is to make the mind one-pointed, and to concentrate it on one thought, and thus exclude our many thoughts.

If we do this, eventually – even the one thought will go, and the mind will get extinguished, in its Source.

When we Enquire within: ‘Who am I ?’, the ‘i’ investigated is the ego. It is that which makes Vichara (Enquiry) also.

The Self has no ‘vichara’.

That which makes the enquiry, is ‘the ego’. The ‘i’ about which The Enquiry is made, is also the ego.

As the result of The Enquiry, the ego ceases to exist, and only The Self is found to exist.

What is the best way of killing the ego?
… To each person, that way is best, which appears easiest, or appeals the most.

All the ways, are equally good, as they lead to the same goal, which is the merging of the ego, in The Self.

What The Bhakta calls Surrender, the man who does Vichara calls Jnana. Both are trying to take the ego back to The Source from which it sprang, and make it merge there.

To ask the mind to kill itself, is like making the thief the policeman. He will go with you and pretend to catch the thief, but nothing will be gained.

So you must turn inward, and see from whence the mind rises, and then it will cease to exist.

  • Breath – and mind, arise from the same Source, and when one of them is controlled – the other is also controlled.*

As a matter of fact, in the quest method – which is more correctly: ‘Whence Am I?’ and Not merely ‘Who am I?’:

We are not simply trying to eliminate, saying; ‘We are not the body, nor the senses and so on’, to reach what remains as; ‘The Ultimate Reality’, but we are trying to find out: ‘whence’ the ‘I-thought’ – or the ego, arises within us.

The method contains within it – though implicitly, and not expressly: ‘the watching of the breath’.

When we watch wherefrom the ‘I-thought’ arises, we are necessarily watching The Source of breath also; as The ‘I-Thought’ and the breath, arise from ‘The Same Source’.

Breath Control – may do as an aid, but can never – by itself, lead to The Goal.

While doing it mechanically, take care to be alert in mind, and to remember the ‘I- thought’, and the quest for its Source.

Then you will find that where the breath sinks – there, the ‘I-Thought’ arises. They sink and arise together.

The ‘I-Thought’ will also sink along with the breath.

Simultaneously, another luminous and Infinite ‘I-I’ , will emerge, and it will be continuous and Unbroken. That is The Goal!

It goes by different names – God, Self, Kundalini, Shakti, Consciousness, etc.

‘Who am I?’ is not ‘a mantra’.

It means that you must find out where – in you, the ‘I-Thought’ arises, which is The Source of all other thoughts.

But if you find that Vichara Marga (The Path Of Enquiry) is too hard for you,
… Then you go on repeating ‘I-I’, and that will lead you to the same Goal.

There is no harm in using ‘I’ – as a ‘mantra’. It is the first name of God.

I ask you to see where the ‘I’ arises in your body; but it is not really quite correct to say that the ‘I’ rises from, and merges in, The Heart – on the right side of the chest.

The Heart is another name for The Reality, and IT is neither inside nor outside the body. There can be no ‘in’, and ‘out’ for IT; since IT – Alone, IS.

I do not mean by ‘Heart’ any physiological organ, any plexus of nerves or anything like that, but so long as one identifies oneself with the body and thinks he is the body, he is advised to see – in the body, where the ‘I-Thought’ rises, and merges again.

It must be The Heart, at the right side of the chest, since every man of whatever race and religion, and in whatever language he may be saying – ‘I’, points to the right side of his chest, to indicate himself.

This is True, all over the world!

So ‘That’ must be ‘The place’; and by keenly watching the emergence of the ‘I-Thought’ – on waking, and its subsiding – in sleep, one can see that it is in The Heart, on the right side.

First know who you are! This requires no ‘sastras’ (scripture) or scholarship. This is simple experience.

‘The State Of Being’ is ‘Now and Here’, all along. You have lost hold of yourself and are asking others for guidance.

The purpose of philosophy is to turn the mind inward. If you know yourself, no evil can come to you. Because you asked me – I have told you this.

The ego comes up only holding You (The Self). Hold your Self – and the ego will vanish.

Until then, the sage will be happy saying: ‘There is’, and the ignorant will be asking, ‘Where?’

Regulation of life; such as getting up at a fixed hour, bathing, doing mantra-japa, etc.; all this is for people who do not feel drawn to Self-Enquiry, or are not capable of it.

But for those who can practise this method; all rules and disciplines are unnecessary.

Undoubtedly, it is said in some books, that one should go on cultivating one good quality after another, and thus prepare for Moksha; but for those who follow The Jnana – or Vichara Marga, their sadhana is itself quite enough for acquiring all Daivic (Divine) Qualities;

They need not do anything else!

What is Gayatri? It really means; ‘Let me concentrate on ‘That’, which illumines All’.”

~ Ramana Maharshi ~

Wandering bull -RM

The story of the wandering bull (mind)
Sri Ramana had a very appropriate analogy for this process [to bring your awareness within by asking yourself ‘Who am I?’ or, ‘Where does this “I” come from?’].
Imagine that you have a bull, and that you keep it in a stable. If you leave the door open, the bull will wander out, looking for food. It may find food, but a lot of the time it will get into trouble by grazing in cultivated fields. This is an Indian story. Here, there are no boundary fences, so cattle can wander anywhere in search of food. The owners of the fields our bull wanders into will beat it with sticks and throw stones at it to chase it away, but it will come back again and again, and suffer repeatedly, because it doesn’t understand the notion of field boundaries. It is just programmed to look for food and to eat it wherever it finds something edible.
The bull is the mind, the stable is the Self where it arises and to where it returns, and the grazing in the fields represents the mind’s painful addiction to seeking pleasure in outside objects. Sri Ramana said that most mind-control techniques forcibly restrain the bull to stop it from moving around but they don’t do anything about the bull’s fundamental desire to wander and get itself into trouble. You can tie up the mind temporarily with japa (repetition of sacred names) or pranayama (breath control), but when these restraints are loosened, the mind just wanders off again, gets involved in more mischief and suffers again. You can tie up a bull, but it won’t like it. You will just end up with an angry, cantankerous bull that will probably be looking for a chance to commit some act of violence on you.
Sri Ramana likened self-inquiry to holding a bunch of fresh grass under the bull’s nose. As the bull approaches it, you move away in the direction of the stable door and the bull follows you. You lead it back into the stable, and it voluntarily follows you because it wants the pleasure of eating the grass that you are holding in front of it. Once it is inside the stable, you allow it to eat the abundant grass that is always stored there. In this way you train it to stay home. The door of the stable is always left open, and the bull is free to leave and roam about at any time. There is no punishment or restraint. The bull will go out repeatedly, because it is the nature of such animals to wander in search of food, but every time you notice that your bull–mind has wandered out, tempt it back into its stable with the same technique. Don’t try to beat it into submission or you may be attacked, and don’t try to solve the problem forcibly by locking it up. Sooner or later even the dimmest of bulls will understand that, since there is a perpetual supply of tasty food in the stable, there is no point wandering around outside, because that always leads to suffering and punishments. Even though the stable door is always open, the bull will eventually stay inside and enjoy the food that is always there.
David Godman
on Ramana Maharshi

David Godman re Ramana Maharshi

Ramana Maharshi ‘s life & work
Many parts, hours

Be As You Are: The Jnana Yoga Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi

David Godman (his family’s actual surname) read a book in 1974 about the great sage and jnani, Sri Ramana Maharshi, and two years later traveled to his ashram in India. Since then, he has lived almost continuously in Tiruvannamalai, the town where Sri Ramana spent all his adult life. He now lives in a home he built about two miles from the base of Sri Ramana’s beloved Arunachala, a holy mountain in South India. David has published thirteen books on Sri Ramana Maharshi, his teachings and his direct disciples, and shares the inspiration and wisdom of the Jnana Yoga of Sri Ramana with our readers in this interview.
(photo: David Godman speaking from Sri Ramana’s room in India)

Integral Yoga Magazine: How did you first become interested in the teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi and go to India?

David Godman: In the mid-1970s, I read Arthur Osborne’s The Teachings of Ramana Maharshi in His Own Words. Reading Sri Ramana’s words for the first time completely silenced me. My mind stopped asking questions and abandoned its search for spiritual information. It wasn’t that I had found a new set of ideas to believe in. It was more of an experience in which I was pulled into a state of silence. In that silent space, I knew directly and intuitively what Sri Ramana’s words were hinting and pointing at. I spent about a year reading the teachings and practicing the technique of self-inquiry, mostly in Ireland, and then, in early 1976, I decided to go to India to visit Sri Ramana’s ashram. I spent my first eighteen months here just meditating, practicing self-inquiry and occasionally walking round Arunachala. In 1978 I began to do voluntary work for Sri Ramanasramam. I looked after their library from 1978 to 1985, edited their magazine for a short period of time and, from 1985 onward, did research for my various books.

IYM: Are there books on Ramana Maharshi you would recommend for a beginner?

DG: When I compiled Be As You Are: the Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi I specifically targeted westerners who had never heard about Sri Ramana, and who knew little or nothing about the Hindu tradition and its terminology. Anyone in that category should find this book a good place to start. For a good introduction to Sri Ramana’s life, I would recommend Arthur Osborne’s Ramana Maharshi and the Path of Self Knowledge. For those who want more, I can suggest some of the primary texts in which Sri Ramana’s teachings were recorded by those who were listening to him. Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi, Day by Day with Bhagavan, and Maharshi’s Gospel are good places to start.

IYM: Would you tell us something about Sri Ramana’s own spiritual journey?

DG: He had a normal, ordinary childhood in which he exhibited little or no interest in spiritual matters. At the age of sixteen he had a spontaneous awakening, attaining complete and full enlightenment when a sudden and unexpected feeling that he was about to die prompted him into a spontaneous act of self-inquiry. He told no one what had happened to him, but about six weeks later he left home, without telling his family, and headed for the sacred mountain of Arunachala. He spent the rest of his life there.

In one of his poems, composed years later, he wrote, “From my unthinking childhood the immensity of Arunachala had shone in my awareness.” He didn’t know in his childhood that it was a place he could go to; he just had this association with the word Arunachala. He felt, “This is the holiest place, this is the holiest state, this is God himself.” For many years he was in awe of Arunachala and what it represented, without ever really understanding that it was a place of pilgrimage he could actually go to. After his enlightenment experience, he understood that it was the power of Arunachala that had precipitated the experience and pulled him physically towards it. In that same poem I just quoted from he also wrote, “When it [Arunachala] stilled my mind and drew me to itself and I came near, I saw that it was stillness absolute.” This contains a very nice pun. “Achala” is Sanskrit for “mountain” and it also means “absolute stillness.” This poem describes Sri Ramana’s physical pilgrimage to Arunachala, but in another sense he is talking about his mind going back into his heart and becoming totally silent and motionless.

IYM: Many associate the question, “Who am I?” with Sri Ramana’s teachings. Was this the main teaching?

DG: He always maintained that his primary and most effective teaching was the silence that radiated from him on account of his Self-abidance. It stilled the minds of the people who were fortunate enough to be with him and, on occasion, it even gave them a taste of the direct experience that he himself was experiencing all the time. The words, the spoken teachings and the various methods he advocated were for those people who were unable to attune themselves to these silent emanations.

I would say that self-inquiry, telling people to ask themselves, “Who am I?,” was his most distinctive teaching insofar as it was a new and innovative path that no one else had taught before, but I would not even say that it was his main verbal teaching. He spent a lot of time telling people, “You are the Self. The Self is already realized. Just be it,” but of course no one believed him. Instead, they would say, “Yes, but that’s not my experience. What do I do to attain it?” When people spoke to him like this, he would often ask them to do self-inquiry.

IYM: Can you explain the technique of self-inquiry?

DG: The key to understanding self-inquiry is Sri Ramana’s assertion that the individual “I” can only exist in association with the thoughts and perceptions that it latches onto. In “I am angry,” “I see a tree,” “I am a lawyer,” there is a subject “I” who is associating with an object of thought or perception. Sri Ramana taught that, when these associations cease completely, “I” itself disappears. He said that if one could put one’s attention exclusively and continuously on the subject “I,” without being distracted by any extraneous thoughts, this “I,” the sense of individuality, would subside into its source and vanish, leaving an awareness of the Self that is unmediated by any sense of being an individual person.

It’s all about redirecting attention. When you become aware that your mind is directing itself to other thoughts, objects that are not the “I,” he suggested asking, “To whom do these thoughts or things appear?” The answer is, of course, “To me.” Then, having switched attention from objects of thought to the perceiver or thinker of them, Sri Ramana says, “Ask yourself, ‘Who am I?’ or, ‘Where does this “I” come from?’” This process, done repeatedly, de-conditions the “I” from its habit of always looking for and associating with external perceptions, thoughts and ideas. Eventually, when the “I” no longer feels impelled to catch hold of stray thoughts and indulge in them, it simply vanishes since it cannot exist free of associations. If I may summarize: The practice of self-inquiry is unremitting attention to one’s inner feeling of “I.”

IYM: For those who may find this challenging or a bit abstract, are there any helpful hints you could share?

DG: Sri Ramana had a very appropriate analogy for this process. Imagine that you have a bull, and that you keep it in a stable. If you leave the door open, the bull will wander out, looking for food. It may find food, but a lot of the time it will get into trouble by grazing in cultivated fields. This is an Indian story. Here, there are no boundary fences, so cattle can wander anywhere in search of food. The owners of the fields our bull wanders into will beat it with sticks and throw stones at it to chase it away, but it will come back again and again, and suffer repeatedly, because it doesn’t understand the notion of field boundaries. It is just programmed to look for food and to eat it wherever it finds something edible.

The bull is the mind, the stable is the Self where it arises and to where it returns, and the grazing in the fields represents the mind’s painful addiction to seeking pleasure in outside objects. Sri Ramana said that most mind-control techniques forcibly restrain the bull to stop it from moving around but they don’t do anything about the bull’s fundamental desire to wander and get itself into trouble. You can tie up the mind temporarily with japa (repetition of sacred names) or pranayama (breath control), but when these restraints are loosened, the mind just wanders off again, gets involved in more mischief and suffers again. You can tie up a bull, but it won’t like it. You will just end up with an angry, cantankerous bull that will probably be looking for a chance to commit some act of violence on you.

Sri Ramana likened self-inquiry to holding a bunch of fresh grass under the bull’s nose. As the bull approaches it, you move away in the direction of the stable door and the bull follows you. You lead it back into the stable, and it voluntarily follows you because it wants the pleasure of eating the grass that you are holding in front of it. Once it is inside the stable, you allow it to eat the abundant grass that is always stored there. In this way you train it to stay home. The door of the stable is always left open, and the bull is free to leave and roam about at any time. There is no punishment or restraint. The bull will go out repeatedly, because it is the nature of such animals to wander in search of food, but every time you notice that your bull–mind has wandered out, tempt it back into its stable with the same technique. Don’t try to beat it into submission or you may be attacked, and don’t try to solve the problem forcibly by locking it up. Sooner or later even the dimmest of bulls will understand that, since there is a perpetual supply of tasty food in the stable, there is no point wandering around outside, because that always leads to suffering and punishments. Even though the stable door is always open, the bull will eventually stay inside and enjoy the food that is always there.

IYM: What can we do if the mind continues to wander?

DG: Whenever you find the mind wandering around in external objects and sense perceptions, take it back to its stable, which is the heart, the Self, the source from which it rises and to which it returns. In that place it can enjoy the peace and bliss of the Self. When it wanders around outside, looking for pleasure and happiness, it just gets into trouble—but when it stays at home in the heart, it enjoys peace and silence. Eventually, even though the stable door is always open, the mind will choose to stay at home and not wander about. Sri Ramana said that the way of restraint was the way of the yogi. Yogis try to achieve restraint by forcing the mind to be still. Self-inquiry gives the mind the option of wandering wherever it wants to, and it achieves its success by gently persuading the mind that it will always be happier staying at home.

IYM: What about Self-realization?

DG: Though it is not part of Sri Ramana’s analogy of the bull, we can extend this story to cover other parts of his teaching. For realization, for a true and permanent awakening, the bull has to die. While it is alive, and while the door is still open, there is always the possibility that it will stray. If it dies, though, it can never be tempted outside again. In realization, the mind is dead. It is not a state in which the mind is simply experiencing the peace of the Self. When the mind goes voluntarily into the heart and stays there, feeling no urge whatsoever to jump out again, the Self destroys it and Self alone remains.

This is a key part of Sri Ramana’s teachings: The Self can only eliminate the mind when the mind no longer has any tendency to move outwards. While those outward-moving tendencies are still present, even in a latent form, the mind will always be too strong for the Self to dissolve completely. This is why Sri Ramana’s technique works and the forcible-restraint way doesn’t. You can keep the mind restrained for decades, but such a mind will never be consumed by the Self because the desires, the tendencies, the vasanas, are still there. They may not be manifesting, but they are still there. Ultimately, it is the grace or power of the Self that eliminates the final vestiges of the desire-free mind. The mind cannot eliminate itself, but it can offer itself up as a sacrifice to the Self. Through effort, through inquiry, one can take the mind back to the Self and keep it there in a desire-free state. However, mind can’t do anything more than that. In that final moment, it is the power of the Self within that pulls the last remains of the mind back into itself and eliminates it completely.

About David Godman

For the past five years David Godman and two colleagues have been translating Tamil texts in which Muruganar, one of Sri Ramana’s leading devotees, recorded Sri Ramana’s teachings. Some of the teachings were published in 2003 in a book called Padamalai; the remainder is in a work entitled Guru Vachaka Kovai. They also translated the devotional poems of Guhai Namasivaya, a saint who lived on Arunachala about five hundred years ago.